<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" encoding="UTF-8" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:fireside="http://fireside.fm/modules/rss/fireside">
  <channel>
    <fireside:hostname>app01</fireside:hostname>
    <fireside:genDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 12:25:20 +0000</fireside:genDate>
    <generator>Fireside (https://fireside.fm)</generator>
    <title>On Wisdom - Episodes Tagged with “Neoliberalism”</title>
    <link>https://www.onwisdompodcast.com/tags/neoliberalism</link>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2020 02:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
    <description>What does it actually take to think wisely? On Wisdom digs into the empirical science of wisdom, judgment, and decision-making, and what it means for how we live. Igor Grossmann runs the Wisdom &amp;amp; Culture Lab at the University of Waterloo. Charles Cassidy runs the Evidence-Based Wisdom project in London. Each episode pairs freewheeling conversation with guest spots from leading behavioural scientists working on reasoning, wellbeing, culture, and society. Past guests include Adam Grant, Jonathan Haidt, Paul Bloom, Shannon Vallor, Lisa Barrett, David Dunning, Mara Mather, Tom Gilovich, Laura Carstensen, Oliver Burkeman, Simine Vazire, Dacher Keltner, and more. This autumn: a five-episode special series built around the first Annual Review of Psychology chapter on wisdom since 2011, featuring fifteen scholars on narrative, metacognition, measurement, training, and the neuroscience of wise decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:subtitle>What does science tell us about wisdom?</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:author>Charles Cassidy and Igor Grossmann</itunes:author>
    <itunes:summary>What does it actually take to think wisely? On Wisdom digs into the empirical science of wisdom, judgment, and decision-making, and what it means for how we live. Igor Grossmann runs the Wisdom &amp;amp; Culture Lab at the University of Waterloo. Charles Cassidy runs the Evidence-Based Wisdom project in London. Each episode pairs freewheeling conversation with guest spots from leading behavioural scientists working on reasoning, wellbeing, culture, and society. Past guests include Adam Grant, Jonathan Haidt, Paul Bloom, Shannon Vallor, Lisa Barrett, David Dunning, Mara Mather, Tom Gilovich, Laura Carstensen, Oliver Burkeman, Simine Vazire, Dacher Keltner, and more. This autumn: a five-episode special series built around the first Annual Review of Psychology chapter on wisdom since 2011, featuring fifteen scholars on narrative, metacognition, measurement, training, and the neuroscience of wise decisions.</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/6/6e7bd116-2782-4422-a140-42f329164842/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
    <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:keywords>psychology, science, happiness, philosophy, wisdom, decision-making, reasoning, society; judgment; metacognition</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Charles Cassidy and Igor Grossmann</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>charlesdavidcassidy@gmail.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
<itunes:category text="Science">
  <itunes:category text="Social Sciences"/>
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture"/>
<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture">
  <itunes:category text="Philosophy"/>
</itunes:category>
<item>
  <title>24: Misbehavioral Economics: Choosing irrationality</title>
  <link>https://www.onwisdompodcast.com/24</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">82ffab99-f600-4281-b44e-5a1d20b79485</guid>
  <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2020 02:00:00 -0500</pubDate>
  <author>Charles Cassidy and Igor Grossmann</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/6e7bd116-2782-4422-a140-42f329164842/82ffab99-f600-4281-b44e-5a1d20b79485.mp3" length="18724698" type="audio/mp3"/>
  <itunes:episode>24</itunes:episode>
  <itunes:title>Misbehavioral Economics: Choosing irrationality</itunes:title>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Charles Cassidy and Igor Grossmann</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>Are people being reasonable when they act irrationally? Doesn’t rationality and reasonableness mean the same thing? Charles and Igor kick of the new decade by diving into a messy mix of behavioral economics, nudges, moral philosophy and legal studies, to examine what standards guide people’s decisions. Charles asks Igor about core standards that guide people when they try to make a good decision. Igor unpacks how the standard of a rational agent evolved in the 20th century and what implications it has had for modern economics and politics. Charles wonders if there are any reasonable people left on the Clapham omnibus in London. Igor discusses his new work assessing how most people define rationality and reasonableness, showing that irrational behavior may be a consequence of focusing on reasonableness instead. Welcome to Episode 24.</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>39:00</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/6/6e7bd116-2782-4422-a140-42f329164842/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;Are people being reasonable when they act irrationally? Doesn’t rationality and reasonableness mean the same thing? Charles and Igor kick of the new decade by diving into a messy mix of behavioral economics, nudges, moral philosophy and legal studies, to examine what standards guide people’s decisions. Charles asks Igor about core standards that guide people when they try to make a good decision. Igor unpacks how the standard of a rational agent evolved in the 20th century and what implications it has had for modern economics and politics. Charles wonders if there are any reasonable people left on the Clapham omnibus in London. Igor discusses his new work assessing how most people define rationality and reasonableness, showing that irrational behavior may be a consequence of focusing on reasonableness instead. Welcome to Episode 24. &lt;/p&gt;
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>wisdom, psychology, philosophy, social science, happiness, well being, meaning, reasoning, emotions, purpose, Neoliberalism, Keynesian economics, Economics, Milton Friedman, Friedrich von Hayek, Cultural change, Experimental philosophy, Economic games, Rational choice theory, Prisoner’s dilemma, Common’s dilemma, Dictator Game, Sharing, Social Psychology, Public policy, Moral psychology, Civic norms, Self-interest, Utility maximization, Formal logic, Reason, Civic law, Fairness, Cooperation, Richard Thaler, Cass Sunstein, Nudging, Choice architecture, Ethics, Taxes, Books, TV sitcoms, Psycholinguistics, John Rawls, Game theory</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>Are people being reasonable when they act irrationally? Doesn’t rationality and reasonableness mean the same thing? Charles and Igor kick of the new decade by diving into a messy mix of behavioral economics, nudges, moral philosophy and legal studies, to examine what standards guide people’s decisions. Charles asks Igor about core standards that guide people when they try to make a good decision. Igor unpacks how the standard of a rational agent evolved in the 20th century and what implications it has had for modern economics and politics. Charles wonders if there are any reasonable people left on the Clapham omnibus in London. Igor discusses his new work assessing how most people define rationality and reasonableness, showing that irrational behavior may be a consequence of focusing on reasonableness instead. Welcome to Episode 24.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Folk standards of sound judgment: Rationality Versus Reasonableness | Science Advances" rel="nofollow" href="https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/6/2/eaaz0289">Folk standards of sound judgment: Rationality Versus Reasonableness | Science Advances
</a></li><li><a title="Public Reason (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)" rel="nofollow" href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/public-reason/">Public Reason (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
</a></li><li><a title="Neoliberalism - Wikipedia" rel="nofollow" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoliberalism">Neoliberalism - Wikipedia
</a></li><li><a title="The Hedgehog and the Fox | Princeton University Press" rel="nofollow" href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691156002/the-hedgehog-and-the-fox">The Hedgehog and the Fox | Princeton University Press
</a></li><li><a title="Nudge : Richard H. Thaler &amp; Cass Sunstein" rel="nofollow" href="https://archive.org/details/nudgeimprovingde00thal">Nudge : Richard H. Thaler &amp; Cass Sunstein
</a></li><li><a title="Self-Interest, Sacrifice, and Climate Change: (Re-)Framing the British Columbia Carbon Tax - MIT Press Scholarship" rel="nofollow" href="https://mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com/mobile/view/10.7551/mitpress/9780262014366.001.0001/upso-9780262014366-chapter-9">Self-Interest, Sacrifice, and Climate Change: (Re-)Framing the British Columbia Carbon Tax - MIT Press Scholarship
</a></li></ul>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>Are people being reasonable when they act irrationally? Doesn’t rationality and reasonableness mean the same thing? Charles and Igor kick of the new decade by diving into a messy mix of behavioral economics, nudges, moral philosophy and legal studies, to examine what standards guide people’s decisions. Charles asks Igor about core standards that guide people when they try to make a good decision. Igor unpacks how the standard of a rational agent evolved in the 20th century and what implications it has had for modern economics and politics. Charles wonders if there are any reasonable people left on the Clapham omnibus in London. Igor discusses his new work assessing how most people define rationality and reasonableness, showing that irrational behavior may be a consequence of focusing on reasonableness instead. Welcome to Episode 24.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Folk standards of sound judgment: Rationality Versus Reasonableness | Science Advances" rel="nofollow" href="https://advances.sciencemag.org/content/6/2/eaaz0289">Folk standards of sound judgment: Rationality Versus Reasonableness | Science Advances
</a></li><li><a title="Public Reason (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)" rel="nofollow" href="https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/public-reason/">Public Reason (Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy)
</a></li><li><a title="Neoliberalism - Wikipedia" rel="nofollow" href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neoliberalism">Neoliberalism - Wikipedia
</a></li><li><a title="The Hedgehog and the Fox | Princeton University Press" rel="nofollow" href="https://press.princeton.edu/books/paperback/9780691156002/the-hedgehog-and-the-fox">The Hedgehog and the Fox | Princeton University Press
</a></li><li><a title="Nudge : Richard H. Thaler &amp; Cass Sunstein" rel="nofollow" href="https://archive.org/details/nudgeimprovingde00thal">Nudge : Richard H. Thaler &amp; Cass Sunstein
</a></li><li><a title="Self-Interest, Sacrifice, and Climate Change: (Re-)Framing the British Columbia Carbon Tax - MIT Press Scholarship" rel="nofollow" href="https://mitpress.universitypressscholarship.com/mobile/view/10.7551/mitpress/9780262014366.001.0001/upso-9780262014366-chapter-9">Self-Interest, Sacrifice, and Climate Change: (Re-)Framing the British Columbia Carbon Tax - MIT Press Scholarship
</a></li></ul>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
  </channel>
</rss>
