<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" encoding="UTF-8" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:fireside="http://fireside.fm/modules/rss/fireside">
  <channel>
    <fireside:hostname>app03</fireside:hostname>
    <fireside:genDate>Tue, 15 Sep 2026 13:28:38 +0000</fireside:genDate>
    <generator>Fireside (https://fireside.fm)</generator>
    <title>On Wisdom - Episodes Tagged with “Moral Outrage”</title>
    <link>https://www.onwisdompodcast.com/tags/moral%20outrage</link>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2018 05:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <description>What does it actually take to think wisely? On Wisdom digs into the empirical science of wisdom, judgment, and decision-making, and what it means for how we live. Igor Grossmann runs the Wisdom &amp;amp; Culture Lab at the University of Waterloo. Charles Cassidy runs the Evidence-Based Wisdom project in London. Each episode pairs freewheeling conversation with guest spots from leading behavioural scientists working on reasoning, wellbeing, culture, and society. Past guests include Adam Grant, Jonathan Haidt, Paul Bloom, Shannon Vallor, Lisa Barrett, David Dunning, Mara Mather, Tom Gilovich, Laura Carstensen, Oliver Burkeman, Simine Vazire, Dacher Keltner, and more. This autumn: a five-episode special series built around the first Annual Review of Psychology chapter on wisdom since 2011, featuring fifteen scholars on narrative, metacognition, measurement, training, and the neuroscience of wise decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:subtitle>What does science tell us about wisdom?</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:author>Charles Cassidy and Igor Grossmann</itunes:author>
    <itunes:summary>What does it actually take to think wisely? On Wisdom digs into the empirical science of wisdom, judgment, and decision-making, and what it means for how we live. Igor Grossmann runs the Wisdom &amp;amp; Culture Lab at the University of Waterloo. Charles Cassidy runs the Evidence-Based Wisdom project in London. Each episode pairs freewheeling conversation with guest spots from leading behavioural scientists working on reasoning, wellbeing, culture, and society. Past guests include Adam Grant, Jonathan Haidt, Paul Bloom, Shannon Vallor, Lisa Barrett, David Dunning, Mara Mather, Tom Gilovich, Laura Carstensen, Oliver Burkeman, Simine Vazire, Dacher Keltner, and more. This autumn: a five-episode special series built around the first Annual Review of Psychology chapter on wisdom since 2011, featuring fifteen scholars on narrative, metacognition, measurement, training, and the neuroscience of wise decisions.</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/6/6e7bd116-2782-4422-a140-42f329164842/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
    <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:keywords>psychology, science, happiness, philosophy, wisdom, decision-making, reasoning, society; judgment; metacognition</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Charles Cassidy and Igor Grossmann</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>charlesdavidcassidy@gmail.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
<itunes:category text="Science">
  <itunes:category text="Social Sciences"/>
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture"/>
<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture">
  <itunes:category text="Philosophy"/>
</itunes:category>
<item>
  <title>Episode 8: The Dark Side (with Paul Bloom)</title>
  <link>https://www.onwisdompodcast.com/8</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">66295d91-9dcb-48e8-9d84-ca2d3c3b4cd4</guid>
  <pubDate>Thu, 27 Sep 2018 05:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
  <author>Charles Cassidy and Igor Grossmann</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/6e7bd116-2782-4422-a140-42f329164842/66295d91-9dcb-48e8-9d84-ca2d3c3b4cd4.mp3" length="28571523" type="audio/mp3"/>
  <itunes:episode>8</itunes:episode>
  <itunes:title>The Dark Side (with Paul Bloom)</itunes:title>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Charles Cassidy and Igor Grossmann</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>One thing we all seem to agree on is that empathy is an unmitigated good. But what if we are wrong? Might some forms of empathy actually be dangerous for society, biasing preferences towards those that look like us, or even those we find attractive? And even when our closest companions are in pain, is ‘feeling what they feel’ really the best way to help? Are horrific acts of cruelty made palatable by dehumanising the victims, or is the truth actually much worse? And how can social media turn do-gooders into deliverers of unlimited vengeance? Paul Bloom takes Igor and Charles for a walk on the dark side, exploring the treacherous hidden terrain of empathy, harmless torturers, aggregate cruelty and third-party punishment. Igor calls for tech companies to start hiring moral philosophers, Paul raises moral objections to loving your own children, and Charles has his mind blown and heart crushed by a revelatory, yet even darker, interpretation of human cruelty. Welcome to Episode 8.</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>58:40</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://media24.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/6/6e7bd116-2782-4422-a140-42f329164842/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;One thing we all seem to agree on is that empathy is an unmitigated good. But what if we are wrong? Might some forms of empathy actually be dangerous for society, biasing preferences towards those that look like us, or even those we find attractive? And even when our closest companions are in pain, is ‘feeling what they feel’ really the best way to help? Are horrific acts of cruelty made palatable by dehumanising the victims, or is the truth actually much worse? And how can social media turn do-gooders into deliverers of unlimited vengeance? Paul Bloom takes Igor and Charles for a walk on the dark side, exploring the treacherous hidden terrain of empathy, harmless torturers, aggregate cruelty and third-party punishment. Igor calls for tech companies to start hiring moral philosophers, Paul raises moral objections to loving your own children, and Charles has his mind blown and heart crushed by a revelatory, yet even darker, interpretation of human cruelty. Welcome to Episode 8. Special Guest: Paul Bloom.&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
  <itunes:keywords>wisdom, empathy, dehumanisation, online shaming, harmless torturer, moral outrage, rational compassion, against empathy, Paul Bloom, third-party punishment</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>One thing we all seem to agree on is that empathy is an unmitigated good. But what if we are wrong? Might some forms of empathy actually be dangerous for society, biasing preferences towards those that look like us, or even those we find attractive? And even when our closest companions are in pain, is ‘feeling what they feel’ really the best way to help? Are horrific acts of cruelty made palatable by dehumanising the victims, or is the truth actually much worse? And how can social media turn do-gooders into deliverers of unlimited vengeance? Paul Bloom takes Igor and Charles for a walk on the dark side, exploring the treacherous hidden terrain of empathy, harmless torturers, aggregate cruelty and third-party punishment. Igor calls for tech companies to start hiring moral philosophers, Paul raises moral objections to loving your own children, and Charles has his mind blown and heart crushed by a revelatory, yet even darker, interpretation of human cruelty. Welcome to Episode 8.</p><p>Special Guest: Paul Bloom.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Paul Bloom&#39;s Site" rel="nofollow" href="https://campuspress.yale.edu/paulbloom/">Paul Bloom's Site
</a></li><li><a title="The Case Against Empathy - Vox" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.vox.com/conversations/2017/1/19/14266230/empathy-morality-ethics-psychology-compassion-paul-bloom">The Case Against Empathy - Vox
</a></li><li><a title="Against Empathy: Why Emotion-Based Politics Lead to Inaction - Big Think" rel="nofollow" href="https://bigthink.com/videos/paul-bloom-on-empathy-and-politics">Against Empathy: Why Emotion-Based Politics Lead to Inaction - Big Think
</a></li><li><a title="An appraisal theory of empathy and other vicarious emotional experiences: Wondra &amp; Ellsworth (2015)" rel="nofollow" href="http://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Fa0039252">An appraisal theory of empathy and other vicarious emotional experiences: Wondra &amp; Ellsworth (2015)
</a></li><li><a title="Effective Altruism" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.effectivealtruism.org/">Effective Altruism
</a></li><li><a title="The Root of All Cruelty? - Paul Bloom" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/11/27/the-root-of-all-cruelty">The Root of All Cruelty? - Paul Bloom
</a></li><li><a title="Are We All ‘Harmless Torturers’ Now? - Paul Bloom &amp; Matthew Jordan" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/09/opinion/are-we-all-harmless-torturers-now.html">Are We All ‘Harmless Torturers’ Now? - Paul Bloom &amp; Matthew Jordan
</a></li><li><a title="Third-party punishment as a costly signal of trustworthiness: Jordan, Hoffmann, Bloom, Rand (2016)" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nature.com/articles/nature16981">Third-party punishment as a costly signal of trustworthiness: Jordan, Hoffmann, Bloom, Rand (2016)
</a></li><li><a title="Moral outrage in the digital age - Molly Crockett" rel="nofollow" href="https://static1.squarespace.com/static/538ca3ade4b090f9ef331978/t/5a53c0d49140b7212c35b20e/1515438295247/Crockett_2017_NHB_Outrage.pdf">Moral outrage in the digital age - Molly Crockett
</a></li><li><a title="So You&#39;ve Been Publicly Shamed - Jon Ronson - Guardian review" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.theguardian.com/books/2015/mar/15/publicly-shamed-jon-ronson-is-shame-necessary-jennifer-jacquet-review-think-before-you-tweet">So You've Been Publicly Shamed - Jon Ronson - Guardian review
</a></li><li><a title="Barack Obama and the &#39;empathy deficit&#39;" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/jan/04/barack-obama-empathy-deficit">Barack Obama and the 'empathy deficit'
</a></li></ul>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>One thing we all seem to agree on is that empathy is an unmitigated good. But what if we are wrong? Might some forms of empathy actually be dangerous for society, biasing preferences towards those that look like us, or even those we find attractive? And even when our closest companions are in pain, is ‘feeling what they feel’ really the best way to help? Are horrific acts of cruelty made palatable by dehumanising the victims, or is the truth actually much worse? And how can social media turn do-gooders into deliverers of unlimited vengeance? Paul Bloom takes Igor and Charles for a walk on the dark side, exploring the treacherous hidden terrain of empathy, harmless torturers, aggregate cruelty and third-party punishment. Igor calls for tech companies to start hiring moral philosophers, Paul raises moral objections to loving your own children, and Charles has his mind blown and heart crushed by a revelatory, yet even darker, interpretation of human cruelty. Welcome to Episode 8.</p><p>Special Guest: Paul Bloom.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Paul Bloom&#39;s Site" rel="nofollow" href="https://campuspress.yale.edu/paulbloom/">Paul Bloom's Site
</a></li><li><a title="The Case Against Empathy - Vox" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.vox.com/conversations/2017/1/19/14266230/empathy-morality-ethics-psychology-compassion-paul-bloom">The Case Against Empathy - Vox
</a></li><li><a title="Against Empathy: Why Emotion-Based Politics Lead to Inaction - Big Think" rel="nofollow" href="https://bigthink.com/videos/paul-bloom-on-empathy-and-politics">Against Empathy: Why Emotion-Based Politics Lead to Inaction - Big Think
</a></li><li><a title="An appraisal theory of empathy and other vicarious emotional experiences: Wondra &amp; Ellsworth (2015)" rel="nofollow" href="http://psycnet.apa.org/doiLanding?doi=10.1037%2Fa0039252">An appraisal theory of empathy and other vicarious emotional experiences: Wondra &amp; Ellsworth (2015)
</a></li><li><a title="Effective Altruism" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.effectivealtruism.org/">Effective Altruism
</a></li><li><a title="The Root of All Cruelty? - Paul Bloom" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/11/27/the-root-of-all-cruelty">The Root of All Cruelty? - Paul Bloom
</a></li><li><a title="Are We All ‘Harmless Torturers’ Now? - Paul Bloom &amp; Matthew Jordan" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nytimes.com/2018/08/09/opinion/are-we-all-harmless-torturers-now.html">Are We All ‘Harmless Torturers’ Now? - Paul Bloom &amp; Matthew Jordan
</a></li><li><a title="Third-party punishment as a costly signal of trustworthiness: Jordan, Hoffmann, Bloom, Rand (2016)" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.nature.com/articles/nature16981">Third-party punishment as a costly signal of trustworthiness: Jordan, Hoffmann, Bloom, Rand (2016)
</a></li><li><a title="Moral outrage in the digital age - Molly Crockett" rel="nofollow" href="https://static1.squarespace.com/static/538ca3ade4b090f9ef331978/t/5a53c0d49140b7212c35b20e/1515438295247/Crockett_2017_NHB_Outrage.pdf">Moral outrage in the digital age - Molly Crockett
</a></li><li><a title="So You&#39;ve Been Publicly Shamed - Jon Ronson - Guardian review" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.theguardian.com/books/2015/mar/15/publicly-shamed-jon-ronson-is-shame-necessary-jennifer-jacquet-review-think-before-you-tweet">So You've Been Publicly Shamed - Jon Ronson - Guardian review
</a></li><li><a title="Barack Obama and the &#39;empathy deficit&#39;" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.theguardian.com/science/2013/jan/04/barack-obama-empathy-deficit">Barack Obama and the 'empathy deficit'
</a></li></ul>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
  </channel>
</rss>
