<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" encoding="UTF-8" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/" xmlns:admin="http://webns.net/mvcb/" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:googleplay="http://www.google.com/schemas/play-podcasts/1.0" xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd" xmlns:fireside="http://fireside.fm/modules/rss/fireside">
  <channel>
    <fireside:hostname>app02</fireside:hostname>
    <fireside:genDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2026 16:01:39 +0000</fireside:genDate>
    <generator>Fireside (https://fireside.fm)</generator>
    <title>On Wisdom - Episodes Tagged with “Metacognition”</title>
    <link>https://www.onwisdompodcast.com/tags/metacognition</link>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026 12:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
    <description>What does it actually take to think wisely? On Wisdom digs into the empirical science of wisdom, judgment, and decision-making, and what it means for how we live. Igor Grossmann runs the Wisdom &amp; Culture Lab at the University of Waterloo. Charles Cassidy runs the Evidence-Based Wisdom project in London. Each episode pairs freewheeling conversation with guest spots from leading behavioural scientists working on reasoning, wellbeing, culture, and society. Past guests include Adam Grant, Jonathan Haidt, Paul Bloom, Shannon Vallor, Lisa Barrett, David Dunning, Mara Mather, Tom Gilovich, Laura Carstensen, Oliver Burkeman, Simine Vazire, Dacher Keltner, and more. This autumn: a five-episode special series built around the first Annual Review of Psychology chapter on wisdom since 2011, featuring fifteen scholars on narrative, metacognition, measurement, training, and the neuroscience of wise decisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <itunes:type>episodic</itunes:type>
    <itunes:subtitle>What does science tell us about wisdom?</itunes:subtitle>
    <itunes:author>Charles Cassidy and Igor Grossmann</itunes:author>
    <itunes:summary>What does it actually take to think wisely? On Wisdom digs into the empirical science of wisdom, judgment, and decision-making, and what it means for how we live. Igor Grossmann runs the Wisdom &amp; Culture Lab at the University of Waterloo. Charles Cassidy runs the Evidence-Based Wisdom project in London. Each episode pairs freewheeling conversation with guest spots from leading behavioural scientists working on reasoning, wellbeing, culture, and society. Past guests include Adam Grant, Jonathan Haidt, Paul Bloom, Shannon Vallor, Lisa Barrett, David Dunning, Mara Mather, Tom Gilovich, Laura Carstensen, Oliver Burkeman, Simine Vazire, Dacher Keltner, and more. This autumn: a five-episode special series built around the first Annual Review of Psychology chapter on wisdom since 2011, featuring fifteen scholars on narrative, metacognition, measurement, training, and the neuroscience of wise decisions.</itunes:summary>
    <itunes:image href="https://cdn.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/6/6e7bd116-2782-4422-a140-42f329164842/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
    <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
    <itunes:keywords>psychology, science, happiness, philosophy, wisdom, decision-making, reasoning, society; judgment; metacognition</itunes:keywords>
    <itunes:owner>
      <itunes:name>Charles Cassidy and Igor Grossmann</itunes:name>
      <itunes:email>charlesdavidcassidy@gmail.com</itunes:email>
    </itunes:owner>
<itunes:category text="Science">
  <itunes:category text="Social Sciences"/>
</itunes:category>
<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture"/>
<itunes:category text="Society &amp; Culture">
  <itunes:category text="Philosophy"/>
</itunes:category>
<item>
  <title>73: Special Series Episode 5: Wisdom Frontiers</title>
  <link>https://www.onwisdompodcast.com/73</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">49a1c8bc-f3f2-4e75-9e4d-b2ea6ba9b585</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2026 12:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
  <author>Charles Cassidy and Igor Grossmann</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/6e7bd116-2782-4422-a140-42f329164842/49a1c8bc-f3f2-4e75-9e4d-b2ea6ba9b585.mp3" length="33504830" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episode>73</itunes:episode>
  <itunes:title>Special Series Episode 5: Wisdom Frontiers</itunes:title>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Charles Cassidy and Igor Grossmann</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>Can wisdom live beyond the individual, in the organizations we build, and the technologies we create? In the final episode of our special series, Dilip Jeste, Barry Schwartz, and Justin Brienza join Igor and Charles to explore the frontiers of wisdom research, from neuroscience to the design of wiser institutions. Dilip takes us inside the brain systems involved in empathy, emotion regulation, and perspective-taking, while explaining why measuring wisdom remains such a challenge. Barry turns to the organizations we spend our lives in, revealing how even well-intentioned people can make poor judgments when the culture around them gets in the way, and why better decisions depend on creating environments where people can learn from their mistakes. Justin asks how we might build wisdom into institutions themselves, from red-teaming and premortems to incentives that encourage dissent, stewardship, and collective responsibility. The series arrives at one final question: if we can build machines that are increasingly intelligent, what would it mean to make them wise?</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>55:50</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://cdn.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/6/6e7bd116-2782-4422-a140-42f329164842/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Welcome to a five-episode special series built around the first Annual Review of Psychology chapter on wisdom since 2011.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Episode 5: Wisdom Frontiers (with Dilip Jeste, Barry Schwartz, and Justin Brienza)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Can wisdom live beyond the individual, in the organizations we build, and the technologies we create? In the final episode of our special series, Dilip Jeste, Barry Schwartz, and Justin Brienza join Igor and Charles to explore the frontiers of wisdom research, from neuroscience to the design of wiser institutions. Dilip takes us inside the brain systems involved in empathy, emotion regulation, and perspective-taking, while explaining why measuring wisdom remains such a challenge. Barry turns to the organizations we spend our lives in, revealing how even well-intentioned people can make poor judgments when the culture around them gets in the way, and why better decisions depend on creating environments where people can learn from their mistakes. Justin asks how we might build wisdom into institutions themselves, from red-teaming and premortems to incentives that encourage dissent, stewardship, and collective responsibility. The series arrives at one final question: if we can build machines that are increasingly intelligent, what would it mean to make them wise?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Special Guests: Barry Schwartz, Dilip Jeste, and Justin Brienza.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  <itunes:keywords>wisdom, psychology, philosophy, social science, happiness, well being, meaning, reasoning, emotions, purpose, exemplars, narratives, Cristine Legare, Dan McAdams, Laurie Paul, Metacognition, Judgment, Gordon Pennycook, Tom Costello, Steven Fleming, Measuring Wisdom, Judith Glück, Monika Ardelt, Eranda Jayawickreme, Interventions, Training Ethan Kross, Kristján Kristjánsson, Dilip Jeste, Barry Schwartz, Justin Brienza</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p><em>Welcome to a five-episode special series built around the first Annual Review of Psychology chapter on wisdom since 2011.</em></p>

<p><strong>Episode 5: Wisdom Frontiers (with Dilip Jeste, Barry Schwartz, and Justin Brienza)</strong></p>

<p>Can wisdom live beyond the individual, in the organizations we build, and the technologies we create? In the final episode of our special series, Dilip Jeste, Barry Schwartz, and Justin Brienza join Igor and Charles to explore the frontiers of wisdom research, from neuroscience to the design of wiser institutions. Dilip takes us inside the brain systems involved in empathy, emotion regulation, and perspective-taking, while explaining why measuring wisdom remains such a challenge. Barry turns to the organizations we spend our lives in, revealing how even well-intentioned people can make poor judgments when the culture around them gets in the way, and why better decisions depend on creating environments where people can learn from their mistakes. Justin asks how we might build wisdom into institutions themselves, from red-teaming and premortems to incentives that encourage dissent, stewardship, and collective responsibility. The series arrives at one final question: if we can build machines that are increasingly intelligent, what would it mean to make them wise?</p><p>Special Guests: Barry Schwartz, Dilip Jeste, and Justin Brienza.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Barry Schwartz: Our loss of wisdom | TED Talk" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ted.com/talks/barry_schwartz_our_loss_of_wisdom">Barry Schwartz: Our loss of wisdom | TED Talk
</a></li><li><a title="Wisdom in action: A call to bridge fields in psychology (and beyond) to solve complex world problems | American Psychologist. Advance online publication - Glück, J., &amp; Brienza, J. P. (2025)" rel="nofollow" href="https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001593">Wisdom in action: A call to bridge fields in psychology (and beyond) to solve complex world problems | American Psychologist. Advance online publication - Glück, J., &amp; Brienza, J. P. (2025)
</a></li><li><a title="Transforming artificial intelligence into artificial wisdom | Nat. Mental Health 4, 886–897 - Jeste, D.V., Paulus, M.P., Alexopoulos, G.S. et al. (2026)" rel="nofollow" href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s44220-026-00640-6">Transforming artificial intelligence into artificial wisdom | Nat. Mental Health 4, 886–897 - Jeste, D.V., Paulus, M.P., Alexopoulos, G.S. et al. (2026)
</a></li><li><a title="Imagining and building wise machines: The centrality of AI metacognition | Trends in Cognitive Sciences - Johnson, S. G., Karimi, A. H., Bengio, Y., Chater, N., Gerstenberg, T., Larson, K., ... &amp; Grossmann, I. (2026)" rel="nofollow" href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2026.01.002">Imagining and building wise machines: The centrality of AI metacognition | Trends in Cognitive Sciences - Johnson, S. G., Karimi, A. H., Bengio, Y., Chater, N., Gerstenberg, T., Larson, K., ... &amp; Grossmann, I. (2026)
</a></li></ul>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p><em>Welcome to a five-episode special series built around the first Annual Review of Psychology chapter on wisdom since 2011.</em></p>

<p><strong>Episode 5: Wisdom Frontiers (with Dilip Jeste, Barry Schwartz, and Justin Brienza)</strong></p>

<p>Can wisdom live beyond the individual, in the organizations we build, and the technologies we create? In the final episode of our special series, Dilip Jeste, Barry Schwartz, and Justin Brienza join Igor and Charles to explore the frontiers of wisdom research, from neuroscience to the design of wiser institutions. Dilip takes us inside the brain systems involved in empathy, emotion regulation, and perspective-taking, while explaining why measuring wisdom remains such a challenge. Barry turns to the organizations we spend our lives in, revealing how even well-intentioned people can make poor judgments when the culture around them gets in the way, and why better decisions depend on creating environments where people can learn from their mistakes. Justin asks how we might build wisdom into institutions themselves, from red-teaming and premortems to incentives that encourage dissent, stewardship, and collective responsibility. The series arrives at one final question: if we can build machines that are increasingly intelligent, what would it mean to make them wise?</p><p>Special Guests: Barry Schwartz, Dilip Jeste, and Justin Brienza.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Barry Schwartz: Our loss of wisdom | TED Talk" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.ted.com/talks/barry_schwartz_our_loss_of_wisdom">Barry Schwartz: Our loss of wisdom | TED Talk
</a></li><li><a title="Wisdom in action: A call to bridge fields in psychology (and beyond) to solve complex world problems | American Psychologist. Advance online publication - Glück, J., &amp; Brienza, J. P. (2025)" rel="nofollow" href="https://doi.org/10.1037/amp0001593">Wisdom in action: A call to bridge fields in psychology (and beyond) to solve complex world problems | American Psychologist. Advance online publication - Glück, J., &amp; Brienza, J. P. (2025)
</a></li><li><a title="Transforming artificial intelligence into artificial wisdom | Nat. Mental Health 4, 886–897 - Jeste, D.V., Paulus, M.P., Alexopoulos, G.S. et al. (2026)" rel="nofollow" href="https://doi.org/10.1038/s44220-026-00640-6">Transforming artificial intelligence into artificial wisdom | Nat. Mental Health 4, 886–897 - Jeste, D.V., Paulus, M.P., Alexopoulos, G.S. et al. (2026)
</a></li><li><a title="Imagining and building wise machines: The centrality of AI metacognition | Trends in Cognitive Sciences - Johnson, S. G., Karimi, A. H., Bengio, Y., Chater, N., Gerstenberg, T., Larson, K., ... &amp; Grossmann, I. (2026)" rel="nofollow" href="https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tics.2026.01.002">Imagining and building wise machines: The centrality of AI metacognition | Trends in Cognitive Sciences - Johnson, S. G., Karimi, A. H., Bengio, Y., Chater, N., Gerstenberg, T., Larson, K., ... &amp; Grossmann, I. (2026)
</a></li></ul>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
<item>
  <title>72: Special Series Episode 4: Interventions and Training</title>
  <link>https://www.onwisdompodcast.com/72</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">4e79c033-f98d-44fe-872e-6873de37e3a6</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2026 12:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
  <author>Charles Cassidy and Igor Grossmann</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/6e7bd116-2782-4422-a140-42f329164842/4e79c033-f98d-44fe-872e-6873de37e3a6.mp3" length="30204781" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episode>72</itunes:episode>
  <itunes:title>Special Series Episode 4: Interventions and Training</itunes:title>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Charles Cassidy and Igor Grossmann</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>_Welcome to a five-episode special series built around the first Annual Review of Psychology chapter on wisdom since 2011._

**Episode 4: Interventions and Training (with Judith Glück, Ethan Kross, and Kristján Kristjánsson)**

Can we actually learn to be wiser? Judith Glück, Ethan Kross, and Kristján Kristjánsson join Igor and Charles to explore what it takes to develop better judgment, and why getting older or going through difficult experiences doesn't necessarily make us wiser. Judith explains why even people with the right knowledge and reasoning skills can struggle to use them when emotions take over, Ethan reveals how stepping back from our own problems can help us see them in a new light, and Kristján explores the ancient idea of practical wisdom, why it matters for moral development, and how it might be cultivated. Igor and Charles reflect on why experience alone isn't enough, and what it takes to turn difficult situations into opportunities for wiser judgment. But can we take what we know about individual wisdom and use it to build wiser organizations and societies?</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>50:20</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://cdn.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/6/6e7bd116-2782-4422-a140-42f329164842/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Welcome to a five-episode special series built around the first Annual Review of Psychology chapter on wisdom since 2011.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Episode 4: Interventions and Training (with Judith Glück, Ethan Kross, and Kristján Kristjánsson)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Can we actually learn to be wiser? Judith Glück, Ethan Kross, and Kristján Kristjánsson join Igor and Charles to explore what it takes to develop better judgment, and why getting older or going through difficult experiences doesn't necessarily make us wiser. Judith explains why even people with the right knowledge and reasoning skills can struggle to use them when emotions take over, Ethan reveals how stepping back from our own problems can help us see them in a new light, and Kristján explores the ancient idea of practical wisdom, why it matters for moral development, and how it might be cultivated. Igor and Charles reflect on why experience alone isn't enough, and what it takes to turn difficult situations into opportunities for wiser judgment. But can we take what we know about individual wisdom and use it to build wiser organizations and societies?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Special Guests: Ethan Kross, Judith Glück, and Kristján Kristjánsson.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  <itunes:keywords>wisdom, psychology, philosophy, social science, happiness, well being, meaning, reasoning, emotions, purpose, exemplars, narratives, Cristine Legare, Dan McAdams, Laurie Paul, Metacognition, Judgment, Gord Pennycook, Thomas Costello, Steve Fleming, Measuring Wisdom, Judith Glück, Monika Ardelt, Eranda Jayawickreme, Interventions, Training Ethan Kross, Kristján Kristjánsson, Dilip Jeste, Barry Schwartz, Justin Brienza</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p><em>Welcome to a five-episode special series built around the first Annual Review of Psychology chapter on wisdom since 2011.</em></p>

<p><strong>Episode 4: Interventions and Training (with Judith Glück, Ethan Kross, and Kristján Kristjánsson)</strong></p>

<p>Can we actually learn to be wiser? Judith Glück, Ethan Kross, and Kristján Kristjánsson join Igor and Charles to explore what it takes to develop better judgment, and why getting older or going through difficult experiences doesn't necessarily make us wiser. Judith explains why even people with the right knowledge and reasoning skills can struggle to use them when emotions take over, Ethan reveals how stepping back from our own problems can help us see them in a new light, and Kristján explores the ancient idea of practical wisdom, why it matters for moral development, and how it might be cultivated. Igor and Charles reflect on why experience alone isn't enough, and what it takes to turn difficult situations into opportunities for wiser judgment. But can we take what we know about individual wisdom and use it to build wiser organizations and societies?</p><p>Special Guests: Ethan Kross, Judith Glück, and Kristján Kristjánsson.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Navigating the Unknown: The Sociocultural and Metacognitive Architecture of Wisdom (accepted) | Annual Review of Psychology, Volume 78 - Igor Grossmann and Nic M. Weststrate " rel="nofollow" href="https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/c5vh3_v2">Navigating the Unknown: The Sociocultural and Metacognitive Architecture of Wisdom (accepted) | Annual Review of Psychology, Volume 78 - Igor Grossmann and Nic M. Weststrate 
</a></li><li><a title="The Wisdom Researchers and the Elephant: An Integrative Model of Wise Behavior - Judith Glück and Nic M. Weststrate (2022)" rel="nofollow" href="https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683221094650">The Wisdom Researchers and the Elephant: An Integrative Model of Wise Behavior - Judith Glück and Nic M. Weststrate (2022)
</a></li><li><a title="Self-Distancing: Theory, Research, and Current Directions - E. Kross , O. Ayduk (2017)" rel="nofollow" href="https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2016.10.002">Self-Distancing: Theory, Research, and Current Directions - E. Kross , O. Ayduk (2017)
</a></li><li><a title="Exploring Solomon’s Paradox: Self-Distancing Eliminates the Self-Other Asymmetry in Wise Reasoning About Close Relationships in Younger and Older Adults - Igor Grossmann and Ethan Kross (2014)" rel="nofollow" href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614535400">Exploring Solomon’s Paradox: Self-Distancing Eliminates the Self-Other Asymmetry in Wise Reasoning About Close Relationships in Younger and Older Adults - Igor Grossmann and Ethan Kross (2014)
</a></li><li><a title="Phronesis (Practical Wisdom) as a Key to Moral Decision-Making: Comparing Two Models - Maria Silvia Vaccarezza, Michel Croce, Kristján Kristjánsson (2023) " rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jubileecentre.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/PhronesisPractical-Wisdom3_03.pdf">Phronesis (Practical Wisdom) as a Key to Moral Decision-Making: Comparing Two Models - Maria Silvia Vaccarezza, Michel Croce, Kristján Kristjánsson (2023) 
</a></li></ul>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p><em>Welcome to a five-episode special series built around the first Annual Review of Psychology chapter on wisdom since 2011.</em></p>

<p><strong>Episode 4: Interventions and Training (with Judith Glück, Ethan Kross, and Kristján Kristjánsson)</strong></p>

<p>Can we actually learn to be wiser? Judith Glück, Ethan Kross, and Kristján Kristjánsson join Igor and Charles to explore what it takes to develop better judgment, and why getting older or going through difficult experiences doesn't necessarily make us wiser. Judith explains why even people with the right knowledge and reasoning skills can struggle to use them when emotions take over, Ethan reveals how stepping back from our own problems can help us see them in a new light, and Kristján explores the ancient idea of practical wisdom, why it matters for moral development, and how it might be cultivated. Igor and Charles reflect on why experience alone isn't enough, and what it takes to turn difficult situations into opportunities for wiser judgment. But can we take what we know about individual wisdom and use it to build wiser organizations and societies?</p><p>Special Guests: Ethan Kross, Judith Glück, and Kristján Kristjánsson.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Navigating the Unknown: The Sociocultural and Metacognitive Architecture of Wisdom (accepted) | Annual Review of Psychology, Volume 78 - Igor Grossmann and Nic M. Weststrate " rel="nofollow" href="https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/c5vh3_v2">Navigating the Unknown: The Sociocultural and Metacognitive Architecture of Wisdom (accepted) | Annual Review of Psychology, Volume 78 - Igor Grossmann and Nic M. Weststrate 
</a></li><li><a title="The Wisdom Researchers and the Elephant: An Integrative Model of Wise Behavior - Judith Glück and Nic M. Weststrate (2022)" rel="nofollow" href="https://doi.org/10.1177/10888683221094650">The Wisdom Researchers and the Elephant: An Integrative Model of Wise Behavior - Judith Glück and Nic M. Weststrate (2022)
</a></li><li><a title="Self-Distancing: Theory, Research, and Current Directions - E. Kross , O. Ayduk (2017)" rel="nofollow" href="https://doi.org/10.1016/bs.aesp.2016.10.002">Self-Distancing: Theory, Research, and Current Directions - E. Kross , O. Ayduk (2017)
</a></li><li><a title="Exploring Solomon’s Paradox: Self-Distancing Eliminates the Self-Other Asymmetry in Wise Reasoning About Close Relationships in Younger and Older Adults - Igor Grossmann and Ethan Kross (2014)" rel="nofollow" href="https://doi.org/10.1177/0956797614535400">Exploring Solomon’s Paradox: Self-Distancing Eliminates the Self-Other Asymmetry in Wise Reasoning About Close Relationships in Younger and Older Adults - Igor Grossmann and Ethan Kross (2014)
</a></li><li><a title="Phronesis (Practical Wisdom) as a Key to Moral Decision-Making: Comparing Two Models - Maria Silvia Vaccarezza, Michel Croce, Kristján Kristjánsson (2023) " rel="nofollow" href="https://www.jubileecentre.ac.uk/wp-content/uploads/2023/07/PhronesisPractical-Wisdom3_03.pdf">Phronesis (Practical Wisdom) as a Key to Moral Decision-Making: Comparing Two Models - Maria Silvia Vaccarezza, Michel Croce, Kristján Kristjánsson (2023) 
</a></li></ul>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
<item>
  <title>71: Special Series Episode 3: Measuring Wisdom</title>
  <link>https://www.onwisdompodcast.com/71</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">e921e548-08a2-4334-85b6-63f45f16ef1c</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2026 12:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
  <author>Charles Cassidy and Igor Grossmann</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/6e7bd116-2782-4422-a140-42f329164842/e921e548-08a2-4334-85b6-63f45f16ef1c.mp3" length="33304732" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episode>71</itunes:episode>
  <itunes:title>Special Series Episode 3: Measuring Wisdom</itunes:title>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Charles Cassidy and Igor Grossmann</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>Judith Glück, Monika Ardelt, and Eranda Jayawickreme</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>55:30</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://cdn.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/6/6e7bd116-2782-4422-a140-42f329164842/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Welcome to a five-episode special series built around the first Annual Review of Psychology chapter on wisdom since 2011.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Episode 3: Measuring Wisdom (with Judith Glück, Monika Ardelt, and Eranda Jayawickreme)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Can we actually measure wisdom, or are we just measuring how wise people think they are? Judith Glück, Monika Ardelt, and Eranda Jayawickreme join Igor and Charles to explore what happens when we try to turn wisdom into something we can quantify. Judith reveals the surprising differences between questionnaires, performance tests, and assessments of people in real situations, Monika makes the case that wisdom involves a stable quality of character built around reflection, cognition and compassion, and Eranda asks whether we might be better off thinking of traits as patterns of behaviour that change from one situation to another. Along the way, Igor and Charles confront a fundamental question about what a wisdom score is actually telling us, and discover that the answer may be less about choosing between traits and states than understanding how they fit together. But if wisdom is a pattern of states, can we change that pattern?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Special Guests: Eranda Jayawickreme, Judith Glück, and Monika Ardelt.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  <itunes:keywords>wisdom, psychology, philosophy, social science, happiness, well being, meaning, reasoning, emotions, purpose, exemplars, narratives, Cristine Legare, Dan McAdams, Laurie Paul, Metacognition, Judgment, Gord Pennycook, Thomas Costello, Steve Fleming, Measuring Wisdom, Judith Glück, Monika Ardelt, Eranda Jayawickreme, Interventions, Training Ethan Kross, Kristján Kristjánsson, Dilip Jeste, Barry Schwartz, Justin Brienza</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p><em>Welcome to a five-episode special series built around the first Annual Review of Psychology chapter on wisdom since 2011.</em></p>

<p><strong>Episode 3: Measuring Wisdom (with Judith Glück, Monika Ardelt, and Eranda Jayawickreme)</strong></p>

<p>Can we actually measure wisdom, or are we just measuring how wise people think they are? Judith Glück, Monika Ardelt, and Eranda Jayawickreme join Igor and Charles to explore what happens when we try to turn wisdom into something we can quantify. Judith reveals the surprising differences between questionnaires, performance tests, and assessments of people in real situations, Monika makes the case that wisdom involves a stable quality of character built around reflection, cognition and compassion, and Eranda asks whether we might be better off thinking of traits as patterns of behaviour that change from one situation to another. Along the way, Igor and Charles confront a fundamental question about what a wisdom score is actually telling us, and discover that the answer may be less about choosing between traits and states than understanding how they fit together. But if wisdom is a pattern of states, can we change that pattern?</p><p>Special Guests: Eranda Jayawickreme, Judith Glück, and Monika Ardelt.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Navigating the Unknown: The Sociocultural and Metacognitive Architecture of Wisdom (accepted) | Annual Review of Psychology, Volume 78 - Igor Grossmann and Nic M. Weststrate " rel="nofollow" href="https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/c5vh3_v2">Navigating the Unknown: The Sociocultural and Metacognitive Architecture of Wisdom (accepted) | Annual Review of Psychology, Volume 78 - Igor Grossmann and Nic M. Weststrate 
</a></li></ul>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p><em>Welcome to a five-episode special series built around the first Annual Review of Psychology chapter on wisdom since 2011.</em></p>

<p><strong>Episode 3: Measuring Wisdom (with Judith Glück, Monika Ardelt, and Eranda Jayawickreme)</strong></p>

<p>Can we actually measure wisdom, or are we just measuring how wise people think they are? Judith Glück, Monika Ardelt, and Eranda Jayawickreme join Igor and Charles to explore what happens when we try to turn wisdom into something we can quantify. Judith reveals the surprising differences between questionnaires, performance tests, and assessments of people in real situations, Monika makes the case that wisdom involves a stable quality of character built around reflection, cognition and compassion, and Eranda asks whether we might be better off thinking of traits as patterns of behaviour that change from one situation to another. Along the way, Igor and Charles confront a fundamental question about what a wisdom score is actually telling us, and discover that the answer may be less about choosing between traits and states than understanding how they fit together. But if wisdom is a pattern of states, can we change that pattern?</p><p>Special Guests: Eranda Jayawickreme, Judith Glück, and Monika Ardelt.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Navigating the Unknown: The Sociocultural and Metacognitive Architecture of Wisdom (accepted) | Annual Review of Psychology, Volume 78 - Igor Grossmann and Nic M. Weststrate " rel="nofollow" href="https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/c5vh3_v2">Navigating the Unknown: The Sociocultural and Metacognitive Architecture of Wisdom (accepted) | Annual Review of Psychology, Volume 78 - Igor Grossmann and Nic M. Weststrate 
</a></li></ul>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
<item>
  <title>70: Special Series Episode 2: Metacognition and Judgment </title>
  <link>https://www.onwisdompodcast.com/70</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">31cc463f-ae41-4721-85bc-07523b318b89</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 05 Oct 2026 12:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
  <author>Charles Cassidy and Igor Grossmann</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/6e7bd116-2782-4422-a140-42f329164842/31cc463f-ae41-4721-85bc-07523b318b89.mp3" length="23504634" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episode>70</itunes:episode>
  <itunes:title>Special Series Episode 2: Metacognition and Judgment </itunes:title>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Charles Cassidy and Igor Grossmann</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>_Welcome to a five-episode special series built around the first Annual Review of Psychology chapter on wisdom since 2011._

**Episode 2: Metacognition and Judgment  (with Gord Pennycook, Steve Fleming, and Thomas Costello)**

Is thinking _harder_ always the key to making better decisions, or can it sometimes make things worse? Gord Pennycook, Steve Fleming, and Thomas Costello join Igor and Charles to explore what happens when we start thinking about our own thinking. Gord reveals why intelligence and rationality aren't the same thing, and why simply thinking more isn't necessarily the answer, Steve takes us inside the machinery that helps us monitor and regulate our decisions, and Thomas explores what intellectual humility is, how we might recognize it, and why being confident about our own competence can be so misleading. Along the way, Igor and Charles uncover a three-part cycle at the heart of wise judgment: seeking input, resolving conflicts, and monitoring what happens next. So what does it take to become better at knowing what we know, and what we don't?
</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>39:10</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://cdn.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/6/6e7bd116-2782-4422-a140-42f329164842/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Welcome to a five-episode special series built around the first Annual Review of Psychology chapter on wisdom since 2011.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Episode 2: Metacognition and Judgment  (with Gord Pennycook, Steve Fleming, and Thomas Costello)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;Is thinking &lt;em&gt;harder&lt;/em&gt; always the key to making better decisions, or can it sometimes make things worse? Gord Pennycook, Steve Fleming, and Thomas Costello join Igor and Charles to explore what happens when we start thinking about our own thinking. Gord reveals why intelligence and rationality aren't the same thing, and why simply thinking more isn't necessarily the answer, Steve takes us inside the machinery that helps us monitor and regulate our decisions, and Thomas explores what intellectual humility is, how we might recognize it, and why being confident about our own competence can be so misleading. Along the way, Igor and Charles uncover a three-part cycle at the heart of wise judgment: seeking input, resolving conflicts, and monitoring what happens next. So what does it take to become better at knowing what we know, and what we don't?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Special Guests: Gord Pennycook, Steve Fleming, and Thomas Costello.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  <itunes:keywords>wisdom, psychology, philosophy, social science, happiness, well being, meaning, reasoning, emotions, purpose, exemplars, narratives, Cristine Legare, Dan McAdams, Laurie Paul, Metacognition, Judgment, Gord Pennycook, Thomas Costello, Steve Fleming, Measuring Wisdom, Judith Glück, Monika Ardelt, Eranda Jayawickreme, Interventions, Training Ethan Kross, Kristján Kristjánsson, Dilip Jeste, Barry Schwartz, Justin Brienza</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p><em>Welcome to a five-episode special series built around the first Annual Review of Psychology chapter on wisdom since 2011.</em></p>

<p><strong>Episode 2: Metacognition and Judgment  (with Gord Pennycook, Steve Fleming, and Thomas Costello)</strong></p>

<p>Is thinking <em>harder</em> always the key to making better decisions, or can it sometimes make things worse? Gord Pennycook, Steve Fleming, and Thomas Costello join Igor and Charles to explore what happens when we start thinking about our own thinking. Gord reveals why intelligence and rationality aren't the same thing, and why simply thinking more isn't necessarily the answer, Steve takes us inside the machinery that helps us monitor and regulate our decisions, and Thomas explores what intellectual humility is, how we might recognize it, and why being confident about our own competence can be so misleading. Along the way, Igor and Charles uncover a three-part cycle at the heart of wise judgment: seeking input, resolving conflicts, and monitoring what happens next. So what does it take to become better at knowing what we know, and what we don't?</p><p>Special Guests: Gord Pennycook, Steve Fleming, and Thomas Costello.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Navigating the Unknown: The Sociocultural and Metacognitive Architecture of Wisdom (accepted) | Annual Review of Psychology, Volume 78 - Igor Grossmann and Nic M. Weststrate " rel="nofollow" href="https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/c5vh3_v2">Navigating the Unknown: The Sociocultural and Metacognitive Architecture of Wisdom (accepted) | Annual Review of Psychology, Volume 78 - Igor Grossmann and Nic M. Weststrate 
</a></li></ul>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p><em>Welcome to a five-episode special series built around the first Annual Review of Psychology chapter on wisdom since 2011.</em></p>

<p><strong>Episode 2: Metacognition and Judgment  (with Gord Pennycook, Steve Fleming, and Thomas Costello)</strong></p>

<p>Is thinking <em>harder</em> always the key to making better decisions, or can it sometimes make things worse? Gord Pennycook, Steve Fleming, and Thomas Costello join Igor and Charles to explore what happens when we start thinking about our own thinking. Gord reveals why intelligence and rationality aren't the same thing, and why simply thinking more isn't necessarily the answer, Steve takes us inside the machinery that helps us monitor and regulate our decisions, and Thomas explores what intellectual humility is, how we might recognize it, and why being confident about our own competence can be so misleading. Along the way, Igor and Charles uncover a three-part cycle at the heart of wise judgment: seeking input, resolving conflicts, and monitoring what happens next. So what does it take to become better at knowing what we know, and what we don't?</p><p>Special Guests: Gord Pennycook, Steve Fleming, and Thomas Costello.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Navigating the Unknown: The Sociocultural and Metacognitive Architecture of Wisdom (accepted) | Annual Review of Psychology, Volume 78 - Igor Grossmann and Nic M. Weststrate " rel="nofollow" href="https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/c5vh3_v2">Navigating the Unknown: The Sociocultural and Metacognitive Architecture of Wisdom (accepted) | Annual Review of Psychology, Volume 78 - Igor Grossmann and Nic M. Weststrate 
</a></li></ul>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
<item>
  <title>69: Special Series Episode 1: Exemplars and Narratives</title>
  <link>https://www.onwisdompodcast.com/69</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">9deab82f-f1e0-4f22-b948-f1c035de774b</guid>
  <pubDate>Mon, 28 Sep 2026 12:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
  <author>Charles Cassidy and Igor Grossmann</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/6e7bd116-2782-4422-a140-42f329164842/9deab82f-f1e0-4f22-b948-f1c035de774b.mp3" length="24674659" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episode>69</itunes:episode>
  <itunes:title>Special Series Episode 1: Exemplars and Narratives</itunes:title>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Charles Cassidy and Igor Grossmann</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>_Welcome to a five-episode special series built around the first Annual Review of Psychology chapter on wisdom since 2011._

**Episode 1: Exemplars and Narratives (with Cristine Legare, Dan McAdams, and L.A. Paul)**

When we face life challenges, where do our ideas about wise judgment, or even wisdom writ large come from, and how do they shape the way we work through such challenges and live thereafter? Cristine Legare, Dan McAdams, and L.A. Paul join Igor and Charles to explore the stories, proverbs, and exemplars we inherit, and what happens when they don't quite fit the situation in front of us. Cristine reveals why the ideas that stick with us aren't necessarily the ones that are true, Dan explores how the stories we tell about ourselves can help us navigate uncertainty (or trap us in the wrong story), and Laurie asks who (or what) is doing the choosing, if we can’t know in advance how a life-changing decision will transform us?</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>41:07</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://cdn.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/6/6e7bd116-2782-4422-a140-42f329164842/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Welcome to a five-episode special series built around the first Annual Review of Psychology chapter on wisdom since 2011.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Episode 1: Exemplars and Narratives (with Cristine Legare, Dan McAdams, and L.A. Paul)&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;When we face life challenges, where do our ideas about wise judgment, or even wisdom writ large come from, and how do they shape the way we work through such challenges and live thereafter? Cristine Legare, Dan McAdams, and L.A. Paul join Igor and Charles to explore the stories, proverbs, and exemplars we inherit, and what happens when they don't quite fit the situation in front of us. Cristine reveals why the ideas that stick with us aren't necessarily the ones that are true, Dan explores how the stories we tell about ourselves can help us navigate uncertainty (or trap us in the wrong story), and Laurie asks who (or what) is doing the choosing, if we can’t know in advance how a life-changing decision will transform us?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Special Guests: Cristine Legare, Dan McAdams, and L.A. Paul.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  <itunes:keywords>wisdom, psychology, philosophy, social science, happiness, well being, meaning, reasoning, emotions, purpose, exemplars, narratives, Cristine Legare, Dan McAdams, Laurie Paul, Metacognition, Judgment, Gordon Pennycook, Tom Costello, Steven Fleming, Measuring Wisdom, Judith Glück, Monika Ardelt, Eranda Jayawickreme, Interventions, Training Ethan Kross, Kristján Kristjánsson, Dilip Jeste, Barry Schwartz, Justin Brienza</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p><em>Welcome to a five-episode special series built around the first Annual Review of Psychology chapter on wisdom since 2011.</em></p>

<p><strong>Episode 1: Exemplars and Narratives (with Cristine Legare, Dan McAdams, and L.A. Paul)</strong></p>

<p>When we face life challenges, where do our ideas about wise judgment, or even wisdom writ large come from, and how do they shape the way we work through such challenges and live thereafter? Cristine Legare, Dan McAdams, and L.A. Paul join Igor and Charles to explore the stories, proverbs, and exemplars we inherit, and what happens when they don't quite fit the situation in front of us. Cristine reveals why the ideas that stick with us aren't necessarily the ones that are true, Dan explores how the stories we tell about ourselves can help us navigate uncertainty (or trap us in the wrong story), and Laurie asks who (or what) is doing the choosing, if we can’t know in advance how a life-changing decision will transform us?</p><p>Special Guests: Cristine Legare, Dan McAdams, and L.A. Paul.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Navigating the Unknown: The Sociocultural and Metacognitive Architecture of Wisdom (accepted) | Annual Review of Psychology, Volume 78 - Igor Grossmann and Nic M. Weststrate " rel="nofollow" href="https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/c5vh3_v2">Navigating the Unknown: The Sociocultural and Metacognitive Architecture of Wisdom (accepted) | Annual Review of Psychology, Volume 78 - Igor Grossmann and Nic M. Weststrate 
</a></li></ul>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p><em>Welcome to a five-episode special series built around the first Annual Review of Psychology chapter on wisdom since 2011.</em></p>

<p><strong>Episode 1: Exemplars and Narratives (with Cristine Legare, Dan McAdams, and L.A. Paul)</strong></p>

<p>When we face life challenges, where do our ideas about wise judgment, or even wisdom writ large come from, and how do they shape the way we work through such challenges and live thereafter? Cristine Legare, Dan McAdams, and L.A. Paul join Igor and Charles to explore the stories, proverbs, and exemplars we inherit, and what happens when they don't quite fit the situation in front of us. Cristine reveals why the ideas that stick with us aren't necessarily the ones that are true, Dan explores how the stories we tell about ourselves can help us navigate uncertainty (or trap us in the wrong story), and Laurie asks who (or what) is doing the choosing, if we can’t know in advance how a life-changing decision will transform us?</p><p>Special Guests: Cristine Legare, Dan McAdams, and L.A. Paul.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Navigating the Unknown: The Sociocultural and Metacognitive Architecture of Wisdom (accepted) | Annual Review of Psychology, Volume 78 - Igor Grossmann and Nic M. Weststrate " rel="nofollow" href="https://osf.io/preprints/psyarxiv/c5vh3_v2">Navigating the Unknown: The Sociocultural and Metacognitive Architecture of Wisdom (accepted) | Annual Review of Psychology, Volume 78 - Igor Grossmann and Nic M. Weststrate 
</a></li></ul>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
<item>
  <title>68: Special Series Trailer: 5 Episodes on the Science of Wisdom</title>
  <link>https://www.onwisdompodcast.com/68</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">7248ed33-36d3-4ee6-a377-3875796a9c7c</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, 16 Sep 2026 12:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
  <author>Charles Cassidy and Igor Grossmann</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/6e7bd116-2782-4422-a140-42f329164842/7248ed33-36d3-4ee6-a377-3875796a9c7c.mp3" length="1244651" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episode>68</itunes:episode>
  <itunes:title>Special Series Trailer: 5 Episodes on the Science of Wisdom</itunes:title>
  <itunes:episodeType>trailer</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Charles Cassidy and Igor Grossmann</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>From 28th September
Hosted by Igor Grossmann and Charles Cassidy
01 - EXEMPLARS AND NARRATIVES
Cristine Legare - Dan McAdams - Laurie Paul
02 - METACOGNITION AND JUDGMENT
Gordon Pennycook - Tom Costello - Steven Fleming
03 - MEASURING WISDOM
Judith Glück - Monika Ardelt - Eranda Jayawickreme
04 - INTERVENTIONS AND TRAINING
Judith Glück - Ethan Kross - Kristján Kristjánsson
05 - WISDOM FRONTIERS
Dilip Jeste - Barry Schwartz - Justin Brienza
</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>2:04</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://cdn.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/6/6e7bd116-2782-4422-a140-42f329164842/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;From 28th September&lt;br&gt;
Hosted by Igor Grossmann and Charles Cassidy&lt;br&gt;
01 - EXEMPLARS AND NARRATIVES&lt;br&gt;
Cristine Legare - Dan McAdams - Laurie Paul&lt;br&gt;
02 - METACOGNITION AND JUDGMENT&lt;br&gt;
Gordon Pennycook - Tom Costello - Steven Fleming&lt;br&gt;
03 - MEASURING WISDOM&lt;br&gt;
Judith Glück - Monika Ardelt - Eranda Jayawickreme&lt;br&gt;
04 - INTERVENTIONS AND TRAINING&lt;br&gt;
Judith Glück - Ethan Kross - Kristján Kristjánsson&lt;br&gt;
05 - WISDOM FRONTIERS&lt;br&gt;
Dilip Jeste - Barry Schwartz - Justin Brienza&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  <itunes:keywords>wisdom, psychology, philosophy, social science, happiness, well being, meaning, reasoning, emotions, purpose, exemplars, narratives, Cristine Legare, Dan McAdams, Laurie Paul, Metacognition, Judgment, Gordon Pennycook, Tom Costello, Steven Fleming, Measuring Wisdom, Judith Glück, Monika Ardelt, Eranda Jayawickreme, Interventions, Training Ethan Kross, Kristján Kristjánsson, Dilip Jeste, Barry Schwartz, Justin Brienza</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>From 28th September<br>
Hosted by Igor Grossmann and Charles Cassidy<br>
01 - EXEMPLARS AND NARRATIVES<br>
Cristine Legare - Dan McAdams - Laurie Paul<br>
02 - METACOGNITION AND JUDGMENT<br>
Gordon Pennycook - Tom Costello - Steven Fleming<br>
03 - MEASURING WISDOM<br>
Judith Glück - Monika Ardelt - Eranda Jayawickreme<br>
04 - INTERVENTIONS AND TRAINING<br>
Judith Glück - Ethan Kross - Kristján Kristjánsson<br>
05 - WISDOM FRONTIERS<br>
Dilip Jeste - Barry Schwartz - Justin Brienza</p>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>From 28th September<br>
Hosted by Igor Grossmann and Charles Cassidy<br>
01 - EXEMPLARS AND NARRATIVES<br>
Cristine Legare - Dan McAdams - Laurie Paul<br>
02 - METACOGNITION AND JUDGMENT<br>
Gordon Pennycook - Tom Costello - Steven Fleming<br>
03 - MEASURING WISDOM<br>
Judith Glück - Monika Ardelt - Eranda Jayawickreme<br>
04 - INTERVENTIONS AND TRAINING<br>
Judith Glück - Ethan Kross - Kristján Kristjánsson<br>
05 - WISDOM FRONTIERS<br>
Dilip Jeste - Barry Schwartz - Justin Brienza</p>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
<item>
  <title>57: The Epic Challenge of Knowing Thyself (with David Dunning)</title>
  <link>https://www.onwisdompodcast.com/57</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">662ec5c1-5851-43e9-b324-e91f1d70fdde</guid>
  <pubDate>Sat, 07 Oct 2023 18:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
  <author>Charles Cassidy and Igor Grossmann</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/6e7bd116-2782-4422-a140-42f329164842/662ec5c1-5851-43e9-b324-e91f1d70fdde.mp3" length="37824699" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episode>57</itunes:episode>
  <itunes:title>The Epic Challenge of Knowing Thyself (with David Dunning)</itunes:title>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Charles Cassidy and Igor Grossmann</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>Can we ever really know ourselves, or are we destined to always make overly optimistic self-assessments? David Dunning joins Igor and Charles to discuss the Dunning-Kruger effect, the importance of asking the right questions, why arriving at an accurate view of ourselves is so challenging, and the implications for teaching, medicine, and even scientific research. Igor explores the possible reemergence of group assessments in education as a result of advances in AI, David shares why conversations with smart people often end up as competitions to ask the most questions, and Charles reflects on the wisdom-enhancing experience of jury service. Welcome to Episode 57.</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>1:03:02</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://cdn.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/6/6e7bd116-2782-4422-a140-42f329164842/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;Can we ever really know ourselves, or are we destined to always make overly optimistic self-assessments? David Dunning joins Igor and Charles to discuss the Dunning-Kruger effect, the importance of asking the right questions, why arriving at an accurate view of ourselves is so challenging, and the implications for teaching, medicine, and even scientific research. Igor explores the possible reemergence of group assessments in education as a result of advances in AI, David shares why conversations with smart people often end up as competitions to ask the most questions, and Charles reflects on the wisdom-enhancing experience of jury service. Welcome to Episode 57.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Special Guest: David Dunning.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  <itunes:keywords>wisdom, psychology, philosophy, social science, happiness, well being, meaning, reasoning, emotions, purpose, David Dunning, Dunning-Kruger, self-assessment, Justin Kruger, self-awareness, metacognition, checklists, How to Win Friends and Influence People, Dale Carnegie, Jury Service, AI</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>Can we ever really know ourselves, or are we destined to always make overly optimistic self-assessments? David Dunning joins Igor and Charles to discuss the Dunning-Kruger effect, the importance of asking the right questions, why arriving at an accurate view of ourselves is so challenging, and the implications for teaching, medicine, and even scientific research. Igor explores the possible reemergence of group assessments in education as a result of advances in AI, David shares why conversations with smart people often end up as competitions to ask the most questions, and Charles reflects on the wisdom-enhancing experience of jury service. Welcome to Episode 57.</p><p>Special Guest: David Dunning.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one&#39;s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments - J Kruger, D Dunning (1999)" rel="nofollow" href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10626367/">Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments - J Kruger, D Dunning (1999)
</a></li><li><a title="The association between objective and subjective financial literacy: Failure to observe the Dunning-Kruger effect - Gilles E. Gignac (2022)" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886921006036?via%3Dihub">The association between objective and subjective financial literacy: Failure to observe the Dunning-Kruger effect - Gilles E. Gignac (2022)
</a></li><li><a title="Flawed Self-Assessment: Implications for Health, Education, and the Workplace - David Dunning Chip Heath Jerry M. Suls (2004)" rel="nofollow" href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2004.00018.x">Flawed Self-Assessment: Implications for Health, Education, and the Workplace - David Dunning Chip Heath Jerry M. Suls (2004)
</a></li><li><a title="Feeling &quot;Holier Than Thou&quot;: Are Self-Serving Assessments Produced by Errors in Self- or Social Prediction? - Nicholas Epley, David Dunning (2000)" rel="nofollow" href="https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&amp;type=pdf&amp;doi=7e8266e3fa987219bb056978587cdf21acd42448">Feeling "Holier Than Thou": Are Self-Serving Assessments Produced by Errors in Self- or Social Prediction? - Nicholas Epley, David Dunning (2000)
</a></li><li><a title="Why People Fail to Recognize Their Own Incompetence - David Dunning1. Kerri Johnson Joyce Ehrlinger Justin Kruger (2003)" rel="nofollow" href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8721.01235">Why People Fail to Recognize Their Own Incompetence - David Dunning1. Kerri Johnson Joyce Ehrlinger Justin Kruger (2003)
</a></li><li><a title="The Dunning–Kruger Effect: On Being Ignorant of One&#39;s Own Ignorance | Book Chapter - David Dunning (2011)" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123855220000056?via%3Dihub">The Dunning–Kruger Effect: On Being Ignorant of One's Own Ignorance | Book Chapter - David Dunning (2011)
</a></li></ul>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>Can we ever really know ourselves, or are we destined to always make overly optimistic self-assessments? David Dunning joins Igor and Charles to discuss the Dunning-Kruger effect, the importance of asking the right questions, why arriving at an accurate view of ourselves is so challenging, and the implications for teaching, medicine, and even scientific research. Igor explores the possible reemergence of group assessments in education as a result of advances in AI, David shares why conversations with smart people often end up as competitions to ask the most questions, and Charles reflects on the wisdom-enhancing experience of jury service. Welcome to Episode 57.</p><p>Special Guest: David Dunning.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one&#39;s own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments - J Kruger, D Dunning (1999)" rel="nofollow" href="https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/10626367/">Unskilled and unaware of it: how difficulties in recognizing one's own incompetence lead to inflated self-assessments - J Kruger, D Dunning (1999)
</a></li><li><a title="The association between objective and subjective financial literacy: Failure to observe the Dunning-Kruger effect - Gilles E. Gignac (2022)" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/abs/pii/S0191886921006036?via%3Dihub">The association between objective and subjective financial literacy: Failure to observe the Dunning-Kruger effect - Gilles E. Gignac (2022)
</a></li><li><a title="Flawed Self-Assessment: Implications for Health, Education, and the Workplace - David Dunning Chip Heath Jerry M. Suls (2004)" rel="nofollow" href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/j.1529-1006.2004.00018.x">Flawed Self-Assessment: Implications for Health, Education, and the Workplace - David Dunning Chip Heath Jerry M. Suls (2004)
</a></li><li><a title="Feeling &quot;Holier Than Thou&quot;: Are Self-Serving Assessments Produced by Errors in Self- or Social Prediction? - Nicholas Epley, David Dunning (2000)" rel="nofollow" href="https://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/document?repid=rep1&amp;type=pdf&amp;doi=7e8266e3fa987219bb056978587cdf21acd42448">Feeling "Holier Than Thou": Are Self-Serving Assessments Produced by Errors in Self- or Social Prediction? - Nicholas Epley, David Dunning (2000)
</a></li><li><a title="Why People Fail to Recognize Their Own Incompetence - David Dunning1. Kerri Johnson Joyce Ehrlinger Justin Kruger (2003)" rel="nofollow" href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/1467-8721.01235">Why People Fail to Recognize Their Own Incompetence - David Dunning1. Kerri Johnson Joyce Ehrlinger Justin Kruger (2003)
</a></li><li><a title="The Dunning–Kruger Effect: On Being Ignorant of One&#39;s Own Ignorance | Book Chapter - David Dunning (2011)" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/B9780123855220000056?via%3Dihub">The Dunning–Kruger Effect: On Being Ignorant of One's Own Ignorance | Book Chapter - David Dunning (2011)
</a></li></ul>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
<item>
  <title>47: Charting Pandemic Waters: A Common Wisdom Model for Uncertain Times (with Howard Nusbaum) - Rebroadcast</title>
  <link>https://www.onwisdompodcast.com/47</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">c6066877-c59c-401d-9833-66b59aaa6102</guid>
  <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jul 2022 17:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
  <author>Charles Cassidy and Igor Grossmann</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/6e7bd116-2782-4422-a140-42f329164842/c6066877-c59c-401d-9833-66b59aaa6102.mp3" length="37224144" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episode>47</itunes:episode>
  <itunes:title>Charting Pandemic Waters: A Common Wisdom Model for Uncertain Times (with Howard Nusbaum) - Rebroadcast</itunes:title>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Charles Cassidy and Igor Grossmann</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>(First Broadcast - 21st June 2020)

What is the value of wisdom in the time of the global pandemic? Does the community of behavioural scientists studying wisdom agree on anything about the nature of wisdom? Can we say what we now know about wisdom and, conversely, what do we know we don’t yet know? Howard Nusbaum joins Igor and Charles to discuss the recently assembled Toronto Wisdom Task Force and the resulting Common Wisdom Model, meta-cognition, the thorny issue of moral-grounding, and sage advice regarding how to measure wisdom in the lab. Igor stresses the importance of building solid theoretical foundations for the field in the context of the pandemic, Howard reflects on the viability of evil wisdom, and Charles learns that we had better pay close attention today to the values we program into the decision-making robots of tomorrow. </itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>1:02:02</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://cdn.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/6/6e7bd116-2782-4422-a140-42f329164842/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;(First Broadcast - 21st June 2020)&lt;/p&gt;

&lt;p&gt;What is the value of wisdom in the time of the global pandemic? Does the community of behavioural scientists studying wisdom agree on anything about the nature of wisdom? Can we say what we now know about wisdom and, conversely, what do we know we don’t yet know? Howard Nusbaum joins Igor and Charles to discuss the recently assembled Toronto Wisdom Task Force and the resulting Common Wisdom Model, meta-cognition, the thorny issue of moral-grounding, and sage advice regarding how to measure wisdom in the lab. Igor stresses the importance of building solid theoretical foundations for the field in the context of the pandemic, Howard reflects on the viability of evil wisdom, and Charles learns that we had better pay close attention today to the values we program into the decision-making robots of tomorrow. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Special Guest: Howard Nusbaum.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  <itunes:keywords>adversity, alfred binet, artificial intelligence, balance of self- and other-oriented interests, candace vogler, centre for practical wisdom, common wisdom model, cortex-adaptability, dialectal thinking, emotions, epistemic humility, happiness, howard nusbaum, iq, jingle-jangle fallacy, keith stanovich, meaning, metacognition, moral-grounding, nancy snow, perspectival insight, perspectivism, philosophy, propositional logic, psychology, purpose, pursuit of truth, reasoning, shared humanity, social science, social-cognitive processing, toronto wisdom task force, university of chicago, valerie tiberius, value-action gap, values, well being, wisdom, wisdom measurement</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>(First Broadcast - 21st June 2020)</p>

<p>What is the value of wisdom in the time of the global pandemic? Does the community of behavioural scientists studying wisdom agree on anything about the nature of wisdom? Can we say what we now know about wisdom and, conversely, what do we know we don’t yet know? Howard Nusbaum joins Igor and Charles to discuss the recently assembled Toronto Wisdom Task Force and the resulting Common Wisdom Model, meta-cognition, the thorny issue of moral-grounding, and sage advice regarding how to measure wisdom in the lab. Igor stresses the importance of building solid theoretical foundations for the field in the context of the pandemic, Howard reflects on the viability of evil wisdom, and Charles learns that we had better pay close attention today to the values we program into the decision-making robots of tomorrow. </p><p>Special Guest: Howard Nusbaum.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Original Broadcast: Episode 29 - Charting Pandemic Waters: A Common Wisdom Model for Uncertain Times (with Howard Nusbaum)" rel="nofollow" href="https://onwisdompodcast.fireside.fm/29">Original Broadcast: Episode 29 - Charting Pandemic Waters: A Common Wisdom Model for Uncertain Times (with Howard Nusbaum)
</a></li><li><a title="The Science of Wisdom (AEON)" rel="nofollow" href="https://aeon.co/essays/how-psychological-scientists-found-the-empirical-path-to-wisdom">The Science of Wisdom (AEON)
</a></li><li><a title="The Science of Wisdom in a Polarized World: Knowns and Unknowns: Psychological Inquiry: Vol 31, No 2" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1047840X.2020.1750917?journalCode=hpli20">The Science of Wisdom in a Polarized World: Knowns and Unknowns: Psychological Inquiry: Vol 31, No 2
</a></li><li><a title="A Common Model Is Essential for a Cumulative Science of Wisdom: Psychological Inquiry: Vol 31, No 2" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1047840X.2020.1750920?journalCode=hpli20">A Common Model Is Essential for a Cumulative Science of Wisdom: Psychological Inquiry: Vol 31, No 2
</a></li><li><a title="University of Chicago Center for Practical Wisdom | Center for Practical Wisdom | The University of Chicago" rel="nofollow" href="https://wisdomcenter.uchicago.edu/">University of Chicago Center for Practical Wisdom | Center for Practical Wisdom | The University of Chicago
</a></li><li><a title="Wisdom in Context - Igor Grossmann, 2017" rel="nofollow" href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1745691616672066">Wisdom in Context - Igor Grossmann, 2017
</a></li><li><a title="Toronto Wisdom Task Force Meeting 2019 (edited) - YouTube" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tGxVBEoebU">Toronto Wisdom Task Force Meeting 2019 (edited) - YouTube
</a></li><li><a title="AI Open Letter - Future of Life Institute" rel="nofollow" href="https://futureoflife.org/2015/10/27/ai-open-letter/?cn-reloaded=1">AI Open Letter - Future of Life Institute
</a></li></ul>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>(First Broadcast - 21st June 2020)</p>

<p>What is the value of wisdom in the time of the global pandemic? Does the community of behavioural scientists studying wisdom agree on anything about the nature of wisdom? Can we say what we now know about wisdom and, conversely, what do we know we don’t yet know? Howard Nusbaum joins Igor and Charles to discuss the recently assembled Toronto Wisdom Task Force and the resulting Common Wisdom Model, meta-cognition, the thorny issue of moral-grounding, and sage advice regarding how to measure wisdom in the lab. Igor stresses the importance of building solid theoretical foundations for the field in the context of the pandemic, Howard reflects on the viability of evil wisdom, and Charles learns that we had better pay close attention today to the values we program into the decision-making robots of tomorrow. </p><p>Special Guest: Howard Nusbaum.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="Original Broadcast: Episode 29 - Charting Pandemic Waters: A Common Wisdom Model for Uncertain Times (with Howard Nusbaum)" rel="nofollow" href="https://onwisdompodcast.fireside.fm/29">Original Broadcast: Episode 29 - Charting Pandemic Waters: A Common Wisdom Model for Uncertain Times (with Howard Nusbaum)
</a></li><li><a title="The Science of Wisdom (AEON)" rel="nofollow" href="https://aeon.co/essays/how-psychological-scientists-found-the-empirical-path-to-wisdom">The Science of Wisdom (AEON)
</a></li><li><a title="The Science of Wisdom in a Polarized World: Knowns and Unknowns: Psychological Inquiry: Vol 31, No 2" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1047840X.2020.1750917?journalCode=hpli20">The Science of Wisdom in a Polarized World: Knowns and Unknowns: Psychological Inquiry: Vol 31, No 2
</a></li><li><a title="A Common Model Is Essential for a Cumulative Science of Wisdom: Psychological Inquiry: Vol 31, No 2" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/1047840X.2020.1750920?journalCode=hpli20">A Common Model Is Essential for a Cumulative Science of Wisdom: Psychological Inquiry: Vol 31, No 2
</a></li><li><a title="University of Chicago Center for Practical Wisdom | Center for Practical Wisdom | The University of Chicago" rel="nofollow" href="https://wisdomcenter.uchicago.edu/">University of Chicago Center for Practical Wisdom | Center for Practical Wisdom | The University of Chicago
</a></li><li><a title="Wisdom in Context - Igor Grossmann, 2017" rel="nofollow" href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1745691616672066">Wisdom in Context - Igor Grossmann, 2017
</a></li><li><a title="Toronto Wisdom Task Force Meeting 2019 (edited) - YouTube" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tGxVBEoebU">Toronto Wisdom Task Force Meeting 2019 (edited) - YouTube
</a></li><li><a title="AI Open Letter - Future of Life Institute" rel="nofollow" href="https://futureoflife.org/2015/10/27/ai-open-letter/?cn-reloaded=1">AI Open Letter - Future of Life Institute
</a></li></ul>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
<item>
  <title>29: Charting Pandemic Waters: A Common Wisdom Model for Uncertain Times (with Howard Nusbaum)</title>
  <link>https://www.onwisdompodcast.com/29</link>
  <guid isPermaLink="false">d7ca46f8-22e1-417d-9ab2-8565fbd42c48</guid>
  <pubDate>Sun, 21 Jun 2020 14:00:00 -0400</pubDate>
  <author>Charles Cassidy and Igor Grossmann</author>
  <enclosure url="https://aphid.fireside.fm/d/1437767933/6e7bd116-2782-4422-a140-42f329164842/d7ca46f8-22e1-417d-9ab2-8565fbd42c48.mp3" length="32644620" type="audio/mpeg"/>
  <itunes:episode>29</itunes:episode>
  <itunes:title>Charting Pandemic Waters: A Common Wisdom Model for Uncertain Times (with Howard Nusbaum)</itunes:title>
  <itunes:episodeType>full</itunes:episodeType>
  <itunes:author>Charles Cassidy and Igor Grossmann</itunes:author>
  <itunes:subtitle>What is the value of wisdom in the time of the global pandemic? Does the community of behavioural scientists studying wisdom agree on anything about the nature of wisdom? Can we say what we now know about wisdom and, conversely, what do we know we don’t yet know? Howard Nusbaum joins Igor and Charles to discuss the recently assembled Toronto Wisdom Task Force and the resulting Common Wisdom Model, meta-cognition, the thorny issue of moral-grounding, and sage advice regarding how to measure wisdom in the lab. Igor stresses the importance of building solid theoretical foundations for the field in the context of the pandemic, Howard reflects on the viability of evil wisdom, and Charles learns that we had better pay close attention today to the values we program into the decision-making robots of tomorrow. Welcome to Episode 29.</itunes:subtitle>
  <itunes:duration>1:08:00</itunes:duration>
  <itunes:explicit>no</itunes:explicit>
  <itunes:image href="https://cdn.fireside.fm/file/fireside-images-2024/podcasts/images/6/6e7bd116-2782-4422-a140-42f329164842/cover.jpg?v=1"/>
  <description>&lt;p&gt;What is the value of wisdom in the time of the global pandemic? Does the community of behavioural scientists studying wisdom agree on anything about the nature of wisdom? Can we say what we now know about wisdom and, conversely, what do we know we don’t yet know? Howard Nusbaum joins Igor and Charles to discuss the recently assembled Toronto Wisdom Task Force and the resulting Common Wisdom Model, meta-cognition, the thorny issue of moral-grounding, and sage advice regarding how to measure wisdom in the lab. Igor stresses the importance of building solid theoretical foundations for the field in the context of the pandemic, Howard reflects on the viability of evil wisdom, and Charles learns that we had better pay close attention today to the values we program into the decision-making robots of tomorrow. Welcome to Episode 29.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Special Guest: Howard Nusbaum.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
  <itunes:keywords>wisdom, psychology, philosophy, social science, happiness, well being, meaning, reasoning, emotions, purpose, howard nusbaum, centre for practical wisdom, university of chicago, common wisdom model, Toronto wisdom task force, moral-grounding, social-cognitive processing, balance of self- and other-oriented interests, pursuit of truth, shared humanity, metacognition, cortex-adaptability, perspectivism, dialectal thinking, epistemic humility, propositional logic, perspectival insight, IQ, Alfred Binet, wisdom measurement, jingle-jangle fallacy, adversity, artificial intelligence, keith stanovich, values, valerie tiberius, nancy snow, candace vogler, value-action gap</itunes:keywords>
  <content:encoded>
    <![CDATA[<p>What is the value of wisdom in the time of the global pandemic? Does the community of behavioural scientists studying wisdom agree on anything about the nature of wisdom? Can we say what we now know about wisdom and, conversely, what do we know we don’t yet know? Howard Nusbaum joins Igor and Charles to discuss the recently assembled Toronto Wisdom Task Force and the resulting Common Wisdom Model, meta-cognition, the thorny issue of moral-grounding, and sage advice regarding how to measure wisdom in the lab. Igor stresses the importance of building solid theoretical foundations for the field in the context of the pandemic, Howard reflects on the viability of evil wisdom, and Charles learns that we had better pay close attention today to the values we program into the decision-making robots of tomorrow. Welcome to Episode 29.</p><p>Special Guest: Howard Nusbaum.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="The Science of Wisdom in a Polarized World: Knowns and Unknowns: Psychological Inquiry: Vol 31, No 2" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1047840X.2020.1750917">The Science of Wisdom in a Polarized World: Knowns and Unknowns: Psychological Inquiry: Vol 31, No 2
</a></li><li><a title="A Common Model Is Essential for a Cumulative Science of Wisdom: Psychological Inquiry: Vol 31, No 2" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1047840X.2020.1750920">A Common Model Is Essential for a Cumulative Science of Wisdom: Psychological Inquiry: Vol 31, No 2
</a></li><li><a title="University of Chicago Center for Practical Wisdom | Center for Practical Wisdom | The University of Chicago" rel="nofollow" href="https://wisdomcenter.uchicago.edu/">University of Chicago Center for Practical Wisdom | Center for Practical Wisdom | The University of Chicago
</a></li><li><a title="Wisdom in Context - Igor Grossmann, 2017" rel="nofollow" href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1745691616672066">Wisdom in Context - Igor Grossmann, 2017
</a></li><li><a title="Toronto Wisdom Task Force Meeting 2019 (edited) - YouTube" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tGxVBEoebU">Toronto Wisdom Task Force Meeting 2019 (edited) - YouTube
</a></li><li><a title="AI Open Letter - Future of Life Institute" rel="nofollow" href="https://futureoflife.org/ai-open-letter/?cn-reloaded=1">AI Open Letter - Future of Life Institute
</a></li></ul>]]>
  </content:encoded>
  <itunes:summary>
    <![CDATA[<p>What is the value of wisdom in the time of the global pandemic? Does the community of behavioural scientists studying wisdom agree on anything about the nature of wisdom? Can we say what we now know about wisdom and, conversely, what do we know we don’t yet know? Howard Nusbaum joins Igor and Charles to discuss the recently assembled Toronto Wisdom Task Force and the resulting Common Wisdom Model, meta-cognition, the thorny issue of moral-grounding, and sage advice regarding how to measure wisdom in the lab. Igor stresses the importance of building solid theoretical foundations for the field in the context of the pandemic, Howard reflects on the viability of evil wisdom, and Charles learns that we had better pay close attention today to the values we program into the decision-making robots of tomorrow. Welcome to Episode 29.</p><p>Special Guest: Howard Nusbaum.</p><p>Links:</p><ul><li><a title="The Science of Wisdom in a Polarized World: Knowns and Unknowns: Psychological Inquiry: Vol 31, No 2" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1047840X.2020.1750917">The Science of Wisdom in a Polarized World: Knowns and Unknowns: Psychological Inquiry: Vol 31, No 2
</a></li><li><a title="A Common Model Is Essential for a Cumulative Science of Wisdom: Psychological Inquiry: Vol 31, No 2" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/1047840X.2020.1750920">A Common Model Is Essential for a Cumulative Science of Wisdom: Psychological Inquiry: Vol 31, No 2
</a></li><li><a title="University of Chicago Center for Practical Wisdom | Center for Practical Wisdom | The University of Chicago" rel="nofollow" href="https://wisdomcenter.uchicago.edu/">University of Chicago Center for Practical Wisdom | Center for Practical Wisdom | The University of Chicago
</a></li><li><a title="Wisdom in Context - Igor Grossmann, 2017" rel="nofollow" href="https://journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.1177/1745691616672066">Wisdom in Context - Igor Grossmann, 2017
</a></li><li><a title="Toronto Wisdom Task Force Meeting 2019 (edited) - YouTube" rel="nofollow" href="https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9tGxVBEoebU">Toronto Wisdom Task Force Meeting 2019 (edited) - YouTube
</a></li><li><a title="AI Open Letter - Future of Life Institute" rel="nofollow" href="https://futureoflife.org/ai-open-letter/?cn-reloaded=1">AI Open Letter - Future of Life Institute
</a></li></ul>]]>
  </itunes:summary>
</item>
  </channel>
</rss>
